We’ve only just written about an imminent government summit to sort out the problem of inaccurate satnav mapping data sending large vehicles on inappropriate routes, but now comes news of a more serious — and much more dangerous — problem.

We’ve only just written about an imminent government summit to sort out the problem of inaccurate satnav mapping data sending large vehicles on inappropriate routes, but now comes news of a more serious — and much more dangerous — problem.

OpenStreetMap is project set up to create a freely editable map of the world based on user contributions, a bit like a Wikipedia for maps.

Anyone can edit and use its mapping data, and since there’s no cost involved, it allows low or no-cost satnav software to made available to people that otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford it.

Recently, however, it was discovered that some contributors to OpenStreetMap have been vandalising its data rather than improving it, with such changes as reversing the direction of one-way streets in London and New York, and even adding a fake Olympic stadium.

Worse still, the malicious edits were traced to users on networks belonging to Google, which caused some people to wonder if it was part of some deliberate attempt to discredit OpenStreetMap’s data — Google runs its own mapping service, after all.

Google investigated the problem and issued a statement saying that the vandalism was the result of two of its contractors abusing the Google network and that the contractors were “no longer working” at the company.

Given the size and scope of OpenStreetMap, this attempt at vandalism is relatively minor, but it does highlight the need to pay close attention to satnav mapping data, whatever the source.

Blindly following visual or spoken satnav directions without concentrating on what’s outside the windscreen is a recipe for disaster, not least since even the most accurate mapping data is unlikely to take account of road changes made in the couple of months.

[OpenStreetMap]

Share with friends

Follow us on

Most recent motorhome reviews

The Practical Motorhome Mercedes-Benz Marco Polo 250d Sport Long review – 1 - The Mercedes-Benz Marco Polo 250d Sport Long is priced from £56,670 OTR, £63,990 as tested (© Phil Russell/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Chausson Welcome 711 Travel Line review – 1 - The new Chausson 711 is being sold in Welcome Travel Line spec only (© Peter Baber/Practical Motorhome)

Swift Rio 325

£52,180OTR

The Practical Motorhome Swift Rio 325 review – 1 - The 2018 Swift Rio 325 is just 5.99m long and has a licence-friendly MTPLM of 3500kg (© Phil Russell/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome IH N-Class 630 RLS review – 1 - The IH N-Class 630 RLS is priced from £73,995 OTR for the 130bhp variant and from £76,490 OTR for the 180bhp version – we're testing the latter (© Gentleman Jack/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Marquis Majestic 196 review – 1 - Fitting six berths and six travel seats into a 3500kg motorhome is no mean feat – does it work? (© Phil Russell/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Swift Bessacarr 597 review – 1 - The ’van tested has an MTPLM of 3850kg, but there is a version with a 3500kg MTPLM (and a lower payload) – read more in our Swift Bessacarr 597 review (© Peter Baber/Practical Motorhome)