In a study that’s bound to shock fans of driving games worldwide, Continental Tyres has found that motorists who routinely sit on the sofa to tear around a virtual track are actually worse at driving than those who don’t.

In a study that’s bound to shock fans of driving games worldwide, Continental Tyres has found that motorists who routinely sit on the sofa to tear around a virtual track are actually worse at driving than those who don’t.

Continental Tyres quizzed 2,000 motorists between the ages of 17 and 39, 1,000 of whom were self-confessed driving game fans. As might be expected, the gamers reckoned that the skills picked on up-screen were equally applicable to the road, where quicker reaction times, better anticipation of events and a greater understanding of car dynamics meant better driving.

The study, however, also found that gamers tended to speed more often in real life and make more insurance claims than non-gamers — the conclusion being that the inconsequential nature of virtual driving can lead to inability to realise the risks of taking chances when drying a real car.

Peter Rodger, chief examiner for the Institute of Advanced Motorists, said: “I am not surprised that regular gamers find themselves making the same decisions and judgements when driving for real as they do when in the virtual world. The issue is that when actually driving, our actions lead to ‘real’ results, and mistakes have very real consequences.”

Interestingly, the study did reveal that driving games do evidently bestow some benefits upon drivers in the real world. Non-gamers require at least one more attempt than gamers when it comes to passing their driving test, and are more prone to ‘prangs’. That said, these two figures aren’t the most statistically significant — as you can see below.

It’s always difficult to reach firm conclusions from studies of this nature, of course, but Continental Tyres’ ‘safety expert’ Time Bailey did state that they would be working more with IAM to independently assess driving skills of gamers. Until we find out the results of that bit of research though, here’s a breakdown of the findings from this first study:

[Continental Tyres]

Share with friends

Follow us on

Most recent motorhome reviews

The Practical Motorhome Lunar Roadstar EL review – 1 - The Lunar Roadstar EL rides on the very manoeuvrable Renault Master and is powered by a 2.3-litre, Euro 6-compliant, turbodiesel engine with 128bhp (© Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Bailey Autograph 68-2 review – 1 - This rear-lounge, 3500kg ’van is a pretty manageable 6.79m long – the wind-out awning is standard, too (© Practical Motorhome)

Tribute 680

£41,087OTR

The Practical Motorhome Tribute 680 review – 1 - The XL LWB Fiat Ducato-based Tribute 680 has a 25-litre underslung gas tank (© Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Adria Sonic Supreme I 810 SC review – 1 - The 2017-season Adria Sonic Supreme I 810 SC is priced from £86,990 OTR, £98,739 as tested (© Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Swift Rio 340 Black Edition review – 1 - Black cab detailing has been a hit in the Bolero and Kon-Tiki ranges, and has now come to the Rio (© Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Globecar Campscout Revolution review – 1 - This Fiat Ducato-based panel van conversion costs from £47,590 OTR (£50,416 as tested) (© Practical Motorhome)