In a study that’s bound to shock fans of driving games worldwide, Continental Tyres has found that motorists who routinely sit on the sofa to tear around a virtual track are actually worse at driving than those who don’t.

In a study that’s bound to shock fans of driving games worldwide, Continental Tyres has found that motorists who routinely sit on the sofa to tear around a virtual track are actually worse at driving than those who don’t.

Continental Tyres quizzed 2,000 motorists between the ages of 17 and 39, 1,000 of whom were self-confessed driving game fans. As might be expected, the gamers reckoned that the skills picked on up-screen were equally applicable to the road, where quicker reaction times, better anticipation of events and a greater understanding of car dynamics meant better driving.

The study, however, also found that gamers tended to speed more often in real life and make more insurance claims than non-gamers — the conclusion being that the inconsequential nature of virtual driving can lead to inability to realise the risks of taking chances when drying a real car.

Peter Rodger, chief examiner for the Institute of Advanced Motorists, said: “I am not surprised that regular gamers find themselves making the same decisions and judgements when driving for real as they do when in the virtual world. The issue is that when actually driving, our actions lead to ‘real’ results, and mistakes have very real consequences.”

Interestingly, the study did reveal that driving games do evidently bestow some benefits upon drivers in the real world. Non-gamers require at least one more attempt than gamers when it comes to passing their driving test, and are more prone to ‘prangs’. That said, these two figures aren’t the most statistically significant — as you can see below.

It’s always difficult to reach firm conclusions from studies of this nature, of course, but Continental Tyres’ ‘safety expert’ Time Bailey did state that they would be working more with IAM to independently assess driving skills of gamers. Until we find out the results of that bit of research though, here’s a breakdown of the findings from this first study:

[Continental Tyres]

Share with friends

Follow us on

Most recent motorhome reviews

The Practical Motorhome Chausson Flash 530 – 1 - You can get the 2017 Chausson Flash 530 on the Ford Transit (as tested) or on the Fiat Ducato (© Alf Alderson/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome 2017 Elddis Autoquest 195 review – 1 - The 2017 Elddis Autoquest 195 has a licence-friendly MTPLM of 3500kg (© Peter Baber/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome La Strada Regent L review – 1 - The German van converter with an Italian name is back in the UK after many years – and the Regent L is one of La Strada's flagship models (© Peter Baber/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Wingamm Micros-Plus review – 1 - The slick GRP bodyshell sits well with the Volkswagen T6 base vehicle – the Micros-Plus is priced from £62,000 OTR (© Andy Jenkinson/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Autocruise Select 184 review – 1 - The Autocruise Select 184 is priced from £39,885 OTR, however our test ’van had a price tag of £44,570 (© Phil Russell/Practical Motorhome)
The Practical Motorhome Hymer B-Class DynamicLine 588 review – 1 - This four-berth Hymer motorhome costs from £73,500 OTR, £85,128 as tested (© Nick Harding/Practical Motorhome)